Sanjay Goyal v. Amit Goyal
Case brief
What is this about?
Defendant sought rejection of plaint for non-payment of court fee despite extended deadline filed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Defendant held liable; suit rejected.
What did the court decide?
Plaint rejected for non-payment of court fee under Order VII Rule 11 (c) CPC; all future dates cancelled; pending applications disposed of.
What the court decided
$~33
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CS(OS) 449/2024
- SANJAY GOYAL .....Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sagar, Mr. Ronak Gupta and Ms. Nazia Parveen, Advocates
- versus
- AMIT GOYAL .....Defendant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Kakkar, Ms. Rachna Goyal, Mr Prateek Kumar, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
- O R D E R
% 02.08.2024 I.A. 35309/2024 (under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, 1908 on behalf of the defendant)
- This is an application filed by the defendant seeking rejection of the plaint.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the plaint stands rejected for non-payment of court fee despite extended time.
Relief sought in I.A. 35309/2024 regarding rejection of plaint.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sanjay Goyal
- respondent
Amit Goyal
Coram
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court