Allowed

Ms. Ritu Jaju v. Smt. Sarla Sarda & Ors.

Delhi HC1 Aug 2024CS(OS)/740/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court permitted the unconditional withdrawal of a partition suit regarding the estate of the late Sh. Keshav Sarda. The plaintiff, having settled her claims with her mother and brother via relinquishment deeds, was allowed to withdraw. The court also directed a 100% refund of court fees.

What did the court decide?

The suit is withdrawn unconditionally; all pending applications and chamber appeal disposed of; interim orders vacated; 100% court fee refunded.

Ms. Ritu Jaju Vs Smt. Sarla Sarda & Ors. — Property and Title | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~17

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(OS) 740/2022 & O.A. 74/2024

¶4

MS. RITU JAJU .....Plaintiff

¶5

Through: Plaintiff in person

¶6

versus

¶7

SMT. SARLA SARDA & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocate for D- 1 & 2 (through VC) D-2 in person Mr. Nishant Anand and Ms. Gunjan Bansal, Advocates for D-3

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 01.08.2024

¶11

The plaintiff and defendant no. 2 are present in person.

¶12

Learned counsel for defendant nos. 1 and 2 states that the present suit has been filed for the partition estate of late Sh. Keshav Sarda. He states that the plaintiff has amicably resolved all her claims raised in the present suit with defendant nos. 1 and 2. He states that plaintiff and defendant no. 2 are siblings and defendant no. 1 is their mother. Late Sh. Keshav Sarda was the father of plaintiff and defendant no. 2.

¶13

He states that the plaintiff and defendant no. 1 have executed relinquishment deeds in favour of defendant no. 2 herein with respect to the following immovable properties: -

¶14

i. First & Second floors in Property Bearing No. BQ-45, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi-110088;

¶15

CS(OS) 740/2022 Page 1 of 3

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:10:55

¶18

ii. Property bearing no. 4875/24, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, Delhi.

¶19

He states that with the execution of the said registered relinquishment deeds defendant no. 2 is now the exclusive owner of the suit property at Shalimar Bagh and the suit property at Daryaganj with respect to the share owned by late Sh. Keshav Sarda in these two immovable properties.

¶20

Learned counsel for defendant nos. 1 and 2 states that he identifies the plaintiff who is present in Court. Defendant no. 2 has also identified the plaintiff. The identification documents of plaintiff has been handed over which are hereby taken on record. 6. The plaintiff who is present in Court has stated before this Court that she is satisfied with the settlement arrived at with her brother, defendant no. 2 and her mother, defendant no. 1 and she will remain bound by the documents executed by her in favour of defendant no. 2. She states that she seeks to unconditionally withdraw the present suit as all her claims with respect to the estate of late Sh. Keshav Sarda stands satisfied. The statement of the plaintiff is taken on record and she is bound down to the statement.

¶21

This suit is permitted to be withdrawn unconditionally. All pending applications and the chamber appeal stands disposed of.

¶22

Interim orders stand vacated.

¶23

Directions for filing documents

¶24

Learned counsel for defendant nos. 1 and 2 states that he will place on record copies of the duly executed two relinquishment deeds along with the identification documents of the plaintiff within one week.

¶25

Refund of Court Fees

¶26

The plaintiff who appears in person states that in view of the fact that she has amicably resolved this matter and the suit is still at the initial stage,

¶27

CS(OS) 740/2022 Page 2 of 3

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:10:55

¶30

she prays for refund of the Court fee deposited with this suit. In view of Section 16 and Section 16A of the Court fee Act, 1870 and the judgment of the Supreme Court in High Court of Madras vs. M.C. Subramaniam¹ , this Court is of the considered opinion that the prayer of the plaintiff seeking refund of Court fees ought to be allowed.

¶31

Accordingly, the registry is directed to issue a certificate of refund in the name of the plaintiff of the 100% Court fee within four weeks. 12. The plaintiff and defendant no. 2 are directed to affix their signatures on this order as an affirmation of their statement made before this Court. The counsel for the defendant no. 2 is directed to identify their signatures.

¶32

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J

¶33

AUGUST 1, 2024/ msh/AKT/msh

¶34

Defendant No. 2 Plaintiff

¶35

( ) ( )

¶36

Counsel for Defendant No. 2

¶37

( )

¶38

1 (2021) 3 SCC 560.

¶39

CS(OS) 740/2022 Page 3 of 3

¶40

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:10:55

Ms. Ritu Jaju v. Smt. Sarla Sarda & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ms. Ritu Jaju v. Smt. Sarla Sarda & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Zia Ur Rehman Vs Abdul Rahman Hasan Ors.

Sunita Mittal Vs Asha Mittal & Ors.

Perfect Synergy Advisory Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sagar Infra Rail International Limited & Ors.

Abdul Rahman Hasan Vs Zia Ur Rahman and Ors.

Sanjay Goyal Vs Amit Goyal

Suresh Chander Malhotra & Anr. Vs Mahesh Chander Malhotra & Anr.

Sandeep Maheshwari & Anr. Vs Vivek Bindra & Ors.

M. L. Kapoor & Anr. Vs Din Dayal Agrawal

Zia Ur Rehman Vs Abdul Rahman Hasan Ors.

Sunita Mittal Vs Asha Mittal & Ors.

Abdul Rahman Hasan Vs Zia Ur Rahman and Ors.

Sanjay Goyal Vs Amit Goyal

Bobby Grover Vs Haprit @ Harpreet Gover and Anr.

Ulike Hospitality (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Rajiv Motors Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.