A single-judge order dismissing a regular bail application. The High Court denied bail citing serious robbery allegations, the yet-to-be-recorded testimony of the complainant, and apprehension of intimidation.
The bail application is dismissed; no bail granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
AYUSH KUMAR SINGH @ AYUSH .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sadanand Kumar, Adv.
versus
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Ravi Nawal PS Moti Nagar
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 04.07.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 01:46:48
electrician in a Banquette House far away from the place of occurrence.
7. Submissions heard.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
JULY 4, 2024/PT
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 01:46:48
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail in a robbery case by knife point.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
AYUSH KUMAR SINGH
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
