Disposed

Ali Imam v. State Gnct of Delhi

Delhi HC5 Jul 2024W.P.(CRL)/391/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Parole modification application by an inmate unable to furnish surety due to lack of family contact after ten years in custody. Court allowed release on parole on personal bond of Rs.10,000 with cash surety of Rs.5,000, citing Supreme Court bail guidelines, keeping other conditions unchanged.

What did the court decide?

Parole order modified: release on personal bond of Rs.10,000 with cash surety of Rs.5,000; other conditions of 05.07.2024 order retained.

Ali Imam Vs State Gnct of Delhi — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~63

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 391/2024

¶4

ALI IMAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Khurana, Mr. Vikram Singh Dalal, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC with Insp. Sudhir Kumar, PS: Jamia Nagar.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

¶8

O R D E R % 18.09.2024

¶9

CRL.M.A. 28240/2024 ( Exemption )

¶10

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶11

Application is allowed.

¶12

CRL.M.A. 28239/2024

¶13

This application has been filed for modification of order dated 29^th July, 2024, which in turn had modified order dated 05^th July, 2024 granting parole to the petitioner.

¶14

By order dated 29^th July, 2024, parole which was originally granted subject to furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount, was modified to furnishing of surety of Rs. 5000/-, considering the guidelines of the Supreme Court n In Re: Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail , SMWP (Crl.) 4/2021.

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:03:53

¶16

This application has been filed stating that the petitioner is not in the contact with any of his family members or any friends who can furnish surety on his behalf. He has not received any visitation from his family members till date and in incarceration for 10 years. He belongs to lower strata of society and, therefore, is unable to furnish society.

¶17

The petitioner is willing to deposit cash surety, which he pleads may be accepted for confirmation of this parole.

¶18

In these circumstances, and in view of the guidelines of the Supreme Court, the order dated 05^th July, 2024, granted parole to the petitioner is modified for petitioner to be released on parole by furnishing a personal bond in sum of Rs. 10,000/- with cash surety of Rs. 5,000/- to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent; rest of the conditions in order dated 05^th July, 2024 shall remain same.

¶19

Copy be sent to the Jail Superintendent for record and compliance.

¶20

Application is accordingly disposed of.

¶21

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶22

ANISH DAYAL, J

¶23

SEPTEMBER 18, 2024/RK

¶24

Ali Imam v. State Gnct of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ali Imam v. State Gnct of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Alias Batola Vs the State Govt of NCT Delhi

Ved Prakash Vs State of NCT

Nitin Goel Vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence

Ramesh @ Dudhiya Vs State NCT of Delhi

Manish Kholi and Ors. Vs the State and Anr.

Indrakali Verma Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Shreyansh Sharma @ M.K. Shreyans & Ors. Vs State Gnct of Delhi & Anr.

Sanjay Kumar and Anr. Vs State Gnctd and Anr.

M/S Ninaniya Estates Limited & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Munnawar @ Manu Vs the State Gnct, Delhi & Anr.

Rafiq Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Lalit Mittal Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Nav Prabhat Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Nitish Kumar Vs Directorate of Revenue Intelligence