Allowed

Sabiha Parveen v. the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC5 Jul 2024W.P.(CRL)/791/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi quashed FIR No. 0377/2021 registered under various IPC sections against the petitioner. The court held that since the parties had amicably settled all disputes via executed Settlement Deeds without coercion, quashing the FIR was in the interest of justice.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 0377/2021 registered at P.S. Darya Ganj for offences punishable under Sections 452/504/506/34 IPC and proceedings pursuant thereto quashed.

Sabiha Parveen Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~6

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 791/2024 SABIHA PARVEEN

¶4

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. S. Bharti and Mohd. Shuaib Khan, Advocates.

¶5

versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

¶6

.....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for State with Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Mr. Jaidev Singh, Mr. Mukul Arora, Mr. Aditya Bhushan, Mr. Anish Yadav and Mr. Anas Naumani, Advocates and SI Priyank Rana, P.S. Daryaganj.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

¶8

O R D E R % 05.07.2024 1. The present Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C., 1973” ) has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.0377/2021 registered under Sections 452/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC, 1860” ) at Police Station Darya Ganj, Delhi.

¶9

Brief facts of the case are that on the complaint of respondent No.2, the police of P.S. Darya Ganj, Delhi registered an FIR against the petitioner. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the parties have already settled all their disputes amicably before the Mediation Cell, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. Pursuant to the settlement, the Settlement Deeds dated 21.09.2023 and 14.10.2023 have been executed between the parties.

¶10

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:05:49

¶11

In view of the Settlement Deeds dated 21.09.2023 and 14.10.2023, the present petition has been filed.

¶12

The parties are present before this Court in-person today, and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer concerned. 6. The parties have submitted that all the disputes have been amicably settled vide Settlement Deeds dated 21.09.2023 and 14.10.2023 and thus, no fruitful purpose will be served in continuing with the FIR. 7. The present petition has been signed by the petitioner and is supported by her affidavit. The parties have reaffirmed the terms of the settlement arrived at vide Settlement Deeds dated 21.09.2023 and 14.10.2023 and they also submit that the said Settlement Deeds dated 21.09.2023 and 14.10.2023 has been arrived at between the parties without any pressure and coercion.

¶13

In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the proceedings. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

¶14

Moreover, there is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

¶15

Accordingly, FIR bearing No. FIR No.0377/2021 registered at P.S. Darya Ganj, for offences punishable under Sections 452/504/506/34 IPC, 1860 is quashed.

¶16

The petition stands disposed of.

¶17

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J

¶18

JULY 5, 2024/va

¶19

Sabiha Parveen v. the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sabiha Parveen v. the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Alias Batola Vs the State Govt of NCT Delhi

Ved Prakash Vs State of NCT

Nitin Goel Vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence

Ramesh @ Dudhiya Vs State NCT of Delhi

Manish Kholi and Ors. Vs the State and Anr.

Indrakali Verma Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Shreyansh Sharma @ M.K. Shreyans & Ors. Vs State Gnct of Delhi & Anr.

Sanjay Kumar and Anr. Vs State Gnctd and Anr.

Ayush Kumar Singh @ Ayush Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Rahul Alias Batola Vs the State Govt of NCT Delhi

Karti P. Chidambaram Vs Directorate of Enforcement

Shri Jj Valaya & Ors. Vs State & Anr.

Sandeep Attri Vs the State & Ors.