The petitioner sought permission to withdraw a criminal writ petition. The Court permitted the withdrawal and disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~44
ABHISHEK SINGH
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate.
versus
THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Ld. ASC for State with SI Jitendra, P.S. Burari.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
AUGUST 14, 2024/va
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2024 at 13:00:23
ABHISHEK SINGH
THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ORS.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
