Disposed

Ravinder Singh Sehrawat & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi HC16 Aug 2024W.P.(CRL)/2503/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR over a family property dispute after settling with the complainant by MOU dated 29.07.2024. The complainant confirmed voluntary settlement and no objection; the court quashed the FIR and consequent proceedings against the petitioners only, other accused not being before the court.

What the court decided

AI extract

Ravinder Singh Sehrawat & Ors. Vs State (Govt. of NCT of… — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~76

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 2503/2024, CRL.M.A. 24389/2024

¶4

RAVINDER SINGH SEHRAWAT & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankit Attree and Mr. Jagat Singh, Advocates with petitioners in person.

¶5

versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for State with Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya, Advocate alongwith ASI Vinay Kumar, P.S. Sector 23, Dwarka. Mr. Vikram Malik, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person.

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R % 16.08.2024

¶8

The present proceedings are instituted under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of the petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No. 260/2022 registered under Sections 452/353/186/120-B/34 IPC at P.S. Sector 23, Dwarka, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

¶9

The present FIR came to be registered on the complaint of respondent No.2 over a family dispute in respect of a property.

¶10

Mr. Lao, learned Standing Counsel for the State, on instructions, submits that apart from present petitioners, there are five more accused persons who have not approached this Court in the present petition. He, on instructions, submits that investigation is pending in the present FIR and

¶11

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/08/2024 at 15:17:31

¶12

chargesheet has not been filed.

¶13

Ld. counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that the other five accused persons are not related to respondent No.2 thus, their whereabouts are not known to them. He further submits that the present settlement has been arrived vide MOU/Settlement Agreement dated 29.07.2024 between the present petitioners and respondent No.2 only.

¶14

Petitioners and respondent No.2, who are present in Court, have been identified by their respective counsels as well as the I.O./ASI Vinay Kumar, P.S. Sector 23, Dwarka, Delhi. Petitioners have shown remorse for their conduct and undertake not to repeat the same in future.

¶15

Respondent No. 2 states that she has entered into the settlement with the present petitioners out of her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She further states that she has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed against the present petitioners and even against those who have not been made party.

¶16

The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

¶17

In view of the above facts and considering that no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed against the present petitioners only.

¶18

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of alongwith pending application.

¶19

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J

¶20

AUGUST 16, 2024/ ga

¶21

Ravinder Singh Sehrawat & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Ravinder Singh Sehrawat & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Eros City Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Govt. of NCT Delhi & Anr.

Abhishek Singh Vs the State (N.C.T. of Delhi) & Ors.

Bharat Kumar @ Manoj @ Mannu Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Ajay Saini in Jc Vs the State and Others

Ritu Jindal Vs Bank of Baroda & Ors.

Ravinder Singh Vs the State NCT of Delhi

Harjit Singh & Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Kunal Singhal & Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Mahinder Pal Singh & Anr. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Hotilal Pandey Vs Ncb of Delhi

Saurabh Vs State and Ors.

Dr Suman Sabharwal Vs Vinod Sharma & Anr.

Geeta Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Kapotri Devi Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors.