Writ petition seeking protection for a minor child in petitioners' custody and restraint on respondents from harming the child or implicating petitioners. Court noted prior direction regarding custody and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
DEEPAK SHARMA & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Counsel for petitioners.
versus
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS......Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for the State with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate with SI Sunil, P.S Tilak Nagar.
Mr. Bipin Kumar Jha, Ms. Komal Jha, Mr. Omkar RAthore, Advocates for R2 to R4 with R2 and R4 in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
%
16.08.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2024 at 13:00:33
had directed that the respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4, shall not take any steps to obtain the custody of the petitioner No. 4, except in accordance with law. It is submitted that the Guardianship Petition has already filed by the respondent No. 2, mother of the child, to seek the custody, in accordance with law.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
AUGUST 16, 2024/RS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2024 at 13:00:33
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the minor child in custody of petitioners requires safeguard and restraint on respondents?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
DEEPAK SHARMA & ORS.
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
