Petitioner sought quashing of FIR. State indicated investigation ongoing and proposed filing final report within 60 days. Petitioner withdrew petition with liberty to file afresh after final report. Court disposed of petition accordingly.
Petition disposed of with liberty to file afresh after filing of final report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~49
PRADEEP KUMAR MISHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Priyam Pandey, Mr. S. K. Pandey, Mr. Rahul Tyagi, Mr. Virender Rajput and Ms. Savita Singh, Advocates.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC with Mr. Himanshu Goel, Mr. Prashant Singh and Mr. Hirak Gupta, Advs. and SI Vikash, PS: Najafgarh. Mr. Piyush Sharma, Mr. Subhash Chandra Sharma and Mr. Pratik Mudgal, Advocates for respondents Nos. 2 to 4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA O R D E R % 13.08.2024
1. Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for quashing of FIR No. 0488/2023, under Sections 288/337/338 IPC, registered at P.S.: Najafgarh and proceedings emanating therefrom. Section 304A IPC has been invoked subsequently.
2. Learned ASC for State informs that the case is still under investigation. On instructions of IO, he further submits that an endeavour shall be made to file the final report within a period of 60 days from today.
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2024 at 13:00:16
3. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh after filing of final report.
4. Taking the statement of learned counsel for petitioner on record, petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to file afresh after filing of final report. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
Nothing stated herein shall tantamount to expression of an opinion on the merits on the case.
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J.
AUGUST 13, 2024/ R
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2024 at 13:00:16
4 provisions across 3 enactments
PRADEEP KUMAR MISHRA
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
