Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the criminal proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
Through: Mr. Mohammad Ali, Mr. Chhatresh Kumar Sahu and Mr. Nadeem Khan, Advocates
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .... Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel with Ms. Priyam Agarwal & Mr.Abhinav Kumar Arya, Advocates for the State and Insp. Uttam Kr.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R % 12.02.2024
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
GIRISH KATHPALIA , J
FEBRUARY 12, 2024/rk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 15:13:52
RAJO ALIAS RAJWANTI
STATE NCT OF DELHI
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
GIRISH KATHPALIA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
