The High Court dismissed a petition seeking to quash an FIR registering offences under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, observing that the petitioner's involvement was stray and no specific case for quashing was made out at that stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
LALIT MITTAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Amit Saxena, Advocate with Ms. Renuka Arora, Mr. Avishek Das Gupta, Ms. Sharon John, Advocates.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Wali, APP for the State with SI Ramesh Kumar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R
% 05.07.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 10:50:28
ANISH DAYAL, J
JULY 5, 2024/RK
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 10:50:28
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, a maternal uncle mentioned in the FIR, is involved in the alleged acts of harassment?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
LALIT MITTAL
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.
ANISH DAYAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
