This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
SHAHEEN PARVEEN .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Javed Ahmed, Mr.Mohd. Faruq, Mr.Ashraf Khan, Advts. with petitioner in person.
versus
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC (Crl.) with Ms.Charu Sharma, Mr.Arjit Sharma, Mr.Vaibhav Vats and Mr.Nikunj Bindal, Advts. Insp.Virender Singh, PS Nand Nagri Mr.Praveen Sharma, Ms.Shivani Tomar and Ms.Chandni, Adv. for R-2/Piyush Thakur
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
O R D E R % 23.09.2024
3. That on the receipt of the application, on the very same day i.e. 09.09.2024, the Investigation Officer visited residence of the Petitioner i.e. H.No.-L-327, Sunder Nagri, Delhi-110093. During the course of Investigation the statement of Petitioner was recorded, wherein she stated that her marriage to Respondent No.2 was formally pronounced on 20.10.2023, at the Arya Samaj Mandir in Vishwas
Nagar, Delhi, after her marriage her in laws forced her to participate in their rituals, which she found uncomfortable to
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/10/2024 at 12:32:16
participate in.
4. That as per the directions passed by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 11.09.2024, the Investigation Officer had provided the contact details of the SHO Nand Nagri, beat staff and division officers, in case the Petitioner required any help. However, the Petitioner on receipt the said contact details, stated that she does not require any police officials visiting her residence and if in case she requires any assistance, then the Petitioner herself will contact on the given phone numbers.
5. That during the course of investigation, the Respondent No. 2 revealed that the Petitioner worked with him at Tech-Mahindra in Noida Sector-62, since past 7 years. The Petitioner and Respondent No. 2 were in an alleged relationship for the past three years, and they both loved each other.
6. That the Respondent No. 2 further revealed that he and Petitioner got married on 20.10.2023, at Sh. Shyama Shyam Sharnam Dharmarth Trust in Vishwas Nagar, Delhi, with the approval of the Petitioner.
8. That the Respondent No. 2 stated that after the marriage rituals were over, an application for registration of marriage dated 20.10.2023 was moved before the Marriage Officer, Preet Vihar. Delhi under the Special Marriage Act, however due to the family and societal pressure the Petitioner left her matrimonial home without the consent of Respondent No. 2 and went back to her paternal home, pursuant to which the marriage could not get registered before SDM Preet Vihar.
9. That the Marriage certificate dated 20.10.2023 and certificate of conversion of religion dated 19.10.2023 of the Petitioner have been verified on 14.09.2024 from Sh. Shyama Shyam Sharnam Dharmarth Trust situated at Vishwas Nagar Delhi and both the documents are found to be authentic.
Copy of Marriage Certificate dated 20.10.2023 is annexed as ANNEXURE A-1.
Copy of certificate of conversion of religion dated 19.10.2023 is annexed as
ANNEXURE A-2.
10. However the undersigned shall abide by any directions passed by this Hon'ble Court.
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/10/2024 at 12:32:16
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 rb/dg
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/10/2024 at 12:32:16
1 issue framed by the court
Whether appropriate action should be taken if a complaint is received regarding the petitioner's situation.
SHAHEEN PARVEEN
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI
PIYUSH THAKUR
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
