The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR registered under Sections 354/341 IPC, finding no merit in the petitioner's claims regarding variance in commercial transaction details or price.
The petition seeking quashing of FIR No.76/2024 was dismissed as it has no merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~80
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for State with ASI Shiv Kumar, PS Shakarpur.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/09/2024 at 12:33:17
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
SEPTEMBER 2, 2024 akc
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/09/2024 at 12:33:17
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition seeking quashing of FIR under Sections 354/341 IPC has merit given the commercial dispute aspects.
Whether variance in number of laptops mentioned affects the criminal allegations.
SHUAIB
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
