The High Court of Delhi dismissed a bail application filed by Vikas Verma seeking 60 days interim bail to facilitate changing the dressing of his wife's operation site. The court relied on hospital records indicating no further surgery or attendant was required, thus rejecting the plea.
The bail application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~61
Through: Mr. K.K. Manan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Nishant Rana, Mr. Aman Goyal, Mr. Adarsh Shandilya, Mr. Karmanya Singh Choudhary and Ms. Ifra Saed, Advs.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Laksh Khanna, APP for State with Insp. Chhote Lal/ATO, PS Sarai Rohilla.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R % 02.09.2024
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
SEPTEMBER 2, 2024 akc
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/09/2024 at 12:19:44
2 issues framed by the court
Whether interim bail should be granted wherein the petitioner sought changing the dressing of the operation site of his wife.
Does the fact that no further surgery is planned and no attendant is required warrant interim bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vikas Verma
State (NCT of Delhi)
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
