Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to rights. The High Court of Delhi disposed of the petition and associated pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
Through: Mr.Sundaram Ojha, Advocate
versus
THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR...Respondents Through: Mr.Amol Sinha, ASC (Crl.) for State with Mr.Kshitiz Garg, Mr.Ashvini Kumari and Ms.Chavi Lazarus, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA O R D E R % 03.09.2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition without prejudice to the rights and contention of the petitioner.
Taking the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner on record, petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J.
SEPTEMBER 03, 2024/v
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/09/2024 at 14:36:23
Sajid
The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
