Petition to quash FIR No. 369/2019 (Sections 420/468/471/34 IPC) arising from a dispute between co-sisters over identity cards made at shared premises. Parties settled amicably via Settlement Deed dated 12.05.2023; keys handed over in court; complainant consented. FIR and consequential proceedings were quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SMT. SHIKSHA BANSAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Nimish Chib, Mr. Rahul Lather, Mr. Manish Kumar, Mr. Pankaj Mann, Mr. Deepak Rajwat and Mr. Rishabh Goyal, Advocates along with petitioner Nos.1 to 3 in person.
versus
STATE ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC (Crl) with Mr. Alok Sharma and Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Advocates along with SI Sudeep, P.S.Prashant Vihar. Mr. R.R.Jangu, Advocate along with respondent No.2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
%
O R D E R 03.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2024 at 12:23:42
the State.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2024 at 12:23:42
consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
SEPTEMBER 3, 2024 rk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2024 at 12:23:42
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR No. 369/2019 under Sections 420/468/471/34 IPC should be quashed in view of the parties' amicable settlement dated 12.05.2023?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
SMT. SHIKSHA BANSAL & ORS.
STATE
Respondent No. 2
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
