Petitioner sought writ directions regarding an FIR transferred to the Economic Offence Wing. The State stated investigation would conclude in three to four months. Finding no orders necessary at this stage and noting the petitioner's liberty to approach the Trial Court under Section 156 CrPC, the court disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~83
ARUNA NANDA .....Petitioner Through: Adv Gayatri Nandwani with Adv Mudita Sharda and Adv Adrian Abbi through V.C. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for the State. Insp. Sanjay Singh, EOW Mandir Marg.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 27.08.2024
CRL.M.A. 25153/2024 ( for exemption )
W.P.(CRL) 2573/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2024 at 12:35:16
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
AUGUST 27, 2024 “SK”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2024 at 12:35:16
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ARUNA NANDA
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
AMIT MAHAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
