The petitioner sought directions for further investigation in an FIR to establish murder charges. The Court noted that a charge-sheet had already been filed and the case was pending trial, holding that no further directions were required and the petitioner could pursue remedies before the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
BIMLESH DEVI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Keshav Sethi, Advocate. versus STATE, NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for the State with Inspector Naveen Kumar, SI Ravinder Chikara, P.S. Samaypur Badli.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 23.08.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2024 at 11:58:54
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
AUGUST 23, 2024/RS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2024 at 11:58:54
1 issue framed by the court
Whether further investigation was required to ascertain if the case was murder rather than attempted suicide?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Bimlesh Devi
State, NCT of Delhi
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
