This contempt-like order directs respondent authorities to dispose of the petitioner's pending parole application within two weeks after reiterating a previous promise that was not fulfilled. The main writ is disposed.
Direction to pass an order on the parole application within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SONU @ JEETU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav and Mr. Prashant Jain, Advs.
versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for the State with Mr. Arjit Sharma, Ms. Charu Sharma, Mr. Vaibhav Vats and Mr. Nikunj Bindal, Advs. with Insp. Manish Bhati and SI Sanjeet.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 28.08.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2024 at 12:35:09
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
AUGUST 28, 2024 ‘KDK’
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2024 at 12:35:09
Sonu @ Jeetu
State (NCT of Delhi)
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
