Petition seeking protection for a couple in a live-in relationship threatened by petitioner No. 1's family. The respondent father undertook not to impede or threaten them; his undertaking was accepted and prior protective directions were continued; petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
SHUSHMITA KUMARI AND ANR .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Javed Ahmad, Advocate (Through VC) (Proxy)
versus
THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHER .....Respondents Through: Mr.Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC (Criminal) with Mr.Alok Sharma and Mr.Vasu Agarwal, Advocates with SI Atul Krishna, PS Gokulpuri with father of Petitioner No.1
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL O R D E R % 27.08.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2024 at 12:34:58
continue to be complied with.
ANISH DAYAL, J
AUGUST 27, 2024 SV
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2024 at 12:34:58
1 issue framed by the court
Whether protection should continue to be provided to the petitioner couple in a live-in relationship facing threats from petitioner No. 1's family?
Shushmita Kumari
Anr
The Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
