Allowed

Vivek Sharma @ Billo v. State NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC15 May 2024W.P.(CRL)/991/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted parole to the petitioner for four weeks to facilitate his daughter's admission in class X, subject to furnishing a bond and adhering to strict conditions regarding communication and surrender upon expiry.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted parole for four weeks from the date of release, conditioned on furnishing a bond and adhering to specified restrictions.

Vivek Sharma @ Billo Vs State NCT of Delhi — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~67

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 991/2024

¶4

VIVEK SHARMA @ BILLO ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr Shannu Baghel, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for the State with Ms Priyam Aggarwal, Advocate with SI Pramod Kumar, PS Krishan Nagar, Delhi.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 15.05.2024

¶11

CRL.M.A. 14907/2024

¶12

This is an application for early hearing.

¶13

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed.

¶14

The application is disposed of.

¶15

W.P.(CRL) 991/2024

¶16

With the consent of parties, the matter is taken up today.

¶17

The present petition has been filed seeking grant of parole to the petitioner for getting his daughter admitted in class X.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the result of two subjects in which compartment was awarded to petitioner’s daughter has now been declared by the school which shows that the petitioner’s daughter has not been able to pass class IX. He submits that the school of the

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2024 at 11:54:26

¶21

daughter needs to be changed and for this purpose a prayer for parole is being made.

¶22

The factum of the result of the petitioner’s daughter has been verified by the IO concerned.

¶23

In view of the above, the petitioner is granted parole for a period of four weeks from the date of his release subject to his furnishing a Personal Bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- and one Surety Bond of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent, further subject to the following conditions:-

¶24

a) Petitioner shall provide mobile number to the IO concerned which shall be kept in working condition at all times and he shall not change the mobile number without prior intimation to the Investigating Officer concerned.

¶25

b) Petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not communicate with or come in contact with the witnesses.

¶26

Upon expiry of period of four weeks as stated above, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent.

¶27

The petition stands disposed of.

¶28

The date already fixed as 21.05.2024 stands cancelled.

¶29

Copy of the order be forwarded to the concerned Jail Superintendent for necessary compliance.

¶30

Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

¶31

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J

¶32

MAY 15, 2024/MK

¶33

This is a digitally signed order.

¶34

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2024 at 11:54:26

Vivek Sharma @ Billo v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vivek Sharma @ Billo v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jyoti Devi Vs Delhi Police, through Its Commissioner

Almas Kakul & Anr. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Babita Munjal and Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Gaurav Chaudhary & Anr. Vs the State of Delhi & Anr.

Sachin Solanki Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Mohd. Ayoub Mir Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Prayagraj Sharma Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Manmohan Singh Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Okoye Ifeanyi.J @John Vs State, NCT of Delhi

Almas Kakul & Anr. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Rahul & Anr. Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Shakir Vs State Govt of NCT

Deepak Yadav & Ors. Vs the State (Gnct of Delhi) through Sho, P.S. New Ashok Nagar & Anr.