The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition and a miscellaneous application seeking quashing of a police notice ordering the petitioner to join an inquiry, as the petitioner had already complied by joining the inquiry and furnishing documents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
| ..... P | etitioner | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Through: | Mr.Ashu | Kumar | Shar | ma and |
| Ms.Preet | i Sin |
gh, | Advs. | |
| (through | VC) |
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS
..... Respondents Through: Ms.Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC (Crl.) with Mr.Abhijeet Kumar and Mr.Sagar Mehlawat, Advs. with SI Ankur Kardam.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA O R D E R
% 21.05.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/05/2024 at 13:04:32
petitioner has joined the inquiry.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
MAY 21, 2024 /ns/ss
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/05/2024 at 13:04:32
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Madhusudan Sharma
State NCT of Delhi
Navin Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
