Dismissed

Ruchi Aggarwal v. Vipin Prakash Aggarwal

Delhi HC19 Jul 2024CONT.CAS(C)/767/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Wife sought contempt against husband for refusing visitation rights. Court dismissed contempt petition as order is executable, however directed Metropolitan Magistrate to use coercive measures to enforce visitation and compliance.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Metropolitan Magistrate to ensure coercive measures are taken to bring children before Court and grant petitioner visitation rights.

Ruchi Aggarwal Vs Vipin Prakash Aggarwal — Child Custody and Guardianship | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 767/2022and CM APPL. 29143/2024

¶4

RUCHI AGGARWAL .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Ankit Rana and Mr. Tushar Rohmetra, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

VIPIN PRAKASH AGGARWAL .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA O R D E R % 19.07.2024

¶8

The petitioner/wife is seeking of issuance of contempt proceedings against the respondent/husband for wilful disobedience of the directions of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate [„MM‟] (Mahila Court), North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi, whereby the visitation rights have been granted to her to meet her two minor children, who are evidently in the custody of their father.

¶9

The said order was assailed by the respondent in Criminal Appeal No. 70/2022 and the said appeal was dismissed by the learned Appellate Court vide order dated 11.05.2022. Thereafter, the respondent/husband approached this Court in Criminal M.C. No. 3165/2022, which also stands dismissed vide order dated 21.02.2024.

¶10

None appeared on behalf of the respondent today.

¶11

Evidently, the respondent is in wilful and contumacious disobedience of the directions of this Court.

¶12

However, having said that, the present petition is not maintainable since the impugned order in question, whereby the

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 05:35:01

¶14

petitioner has been granted visitation rights to meet her minor children is an executable order. It is acknowledged by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter is coming up before the learned MM (Mahila Court), for compliance on 08.08.2024. This Court takes note of the frustration of the petitioner who has been deprived of having a meaningful meeting with her children in an utmost audacious manner by the respondent. Learned MM is directed to ensure that appropriate coercive measures are taken, so as to bring the children before the Court and ensure that the petitioner is granted visitation rights from time to time, in accordance with the orders already passed by the Court.

¶15

A copy of this order be sent learned MM (Mahila Court), North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi, for information and necessary compliance.

¶16

The present petition is disposed of without prejudice.

¶17

The earlier date i.e. 23.09.2024 stands cancelled.

¶18

DHARMESH SHARMA, J.

¶19

JULY 19, 2024 sp

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 05:35:01

Ruchi Aggarwal v. Vipin Prakash Aggarwal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ruchi Aggarwal v. Vipin Prakash Aggarwal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sajal Das & Ors. Vs Ajay Kumar Bhalla

Uma Singhania and Anr. Vs Manoj Chhibber and Anr.

Man Mohan Singh Attri Vs Amrindra Kumar Jha and Ors.

Ankit Sharma Vs Prachika Lochan Gupta

Narayan Singh & Anr. Vs Pooja Bhaskar

Aakanksha Anand Vs Vineet Anand

Mst Priyank Nagarwal & Ors. Vs Shri Rn Sharma & Anr.

Rakesh Sharma Vs Mr Rajnish Khosla

Spring Travels Pvt. Ltd. Vs PNB Housing Finance Ltd. & Anr.

Sajal Das & Ors. Vs Ajay Kumar Bhalla

Shri Sandeep Kumar Bhagat Vs Delhi Development Authority

Tipsy Yadav Vs Prashant Yadav

Rccivl-Rkipl LLP Vs Rcc Infraventures Private Limited & Ors.

Indus Towers Limited Vs Punjab National Bank & Ors.