Writ petition over allotment cost of an MIG flat under NPRSS 1979. Court found petitioner's name was wrongly omitted from draw No. 670 held on 18.11.2016, so DDA's post-COVID escalated cost calculation could not be sustained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~47
SHRI SANDEEP KUMAR BHAGAT .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Ms. Asiya Khan, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
O R D E R % 18.07.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/07/2024 at 11:33:40
period and draw No. 670 was held on 18.11.2016, wherein the name of the petitioner was not considered and the DDA being on wrong foot.
DHARMESH SHARMA, J.
JULY 18, 2024/sa
1 New Pattern Registration Scheme, 1979
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/07/2024 at 11:33:40
1 issue framed by the court
Should the petitioner pay the flat cost at current escalated rates or at the value prevailing on 18.11.2016 when his name was wrongly not considered in draw No. 670?
Shri Sandeep Kumar Bhagat
Delhi Development Authority
Dharmesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
