Dismissed

Rakesh Sharma v. Mr Rajnish Khosla

Delhi HC22 Jul 2024CONT.CAS(C)/1100/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On a contempt petition alleging violation of an order requiring an undertaking, the respondent sought additional time to file the undertaking. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition, which was acceded to. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to withdraw the petition and move an appropriate petition if needed; present petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Rakesh Sharma Vs Mr Rajnish Khosla — Delhi HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~85

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 1100/2024 & CM Appl.40477/2024

¶4

RAKESH SHARMA .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Jitesh Talwani and Mr. Vaibhav Mehra, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

MR RAJNISH KHOSLA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Keshav Sehgal, Mr. Shivam Gaur, Mr. Kshitij Joshi, Mr. Aryan Kumar, Advs.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶10

% 22.07.2024

¶11

The present Petition has been filed by the Petitioner inter-alia stating that the Respondent/Contemnor is in violation of order dated 17.11.2023 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in RFA479/2023. The attention of this Court has been drawn to paragraph 4 and 5 of the order dated 17.11.2023 to submit that the Court had directed Respondent/Contemnor to file an undertaking before the Court in the event, it creates any third party interest in the subject property.

¶12

Learned Counsel for the Respondent/Contemnor, who appears on advance Notice, submits that, inadvertently the undertaking which was directed to be filed by the order dated 17.11.2023 has not been filed. He seeks and is granted three days additional time to file the same. Let the same be filed with an advance copy to the learned Counsel for the Petitioner.

¶13

In this view of the matter, learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks and is granted liberty of the Court to withdraw the present Petition and to move an appropriate Petition, if the need arises.

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 04:42:59

¶15

The Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Pending Application also stand closed.

¶16

Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.

¶17

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

¶18

JULY 22, 2024/r

¶19

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶20

Rakesh Sharma v. Mr Rajnish Khosla

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Sharma v. Mr Rajnish Khosla

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tipsy Yadav Vs Prashant Yadav

Rccivl-Rkipl LLP Vs Rcc Infraventures Private Limited & Ors.

Ruchi Aggarwal Vs Vipin Prakash Aggarwal

Sajal Das & Ors. Vs Ajay Kumar Bhalla

Tapan Sasmal Vs State of Gnct of Delhi & Ors.

Krishna Sasmal Vs M Harsha Vardhan and Ors.

M/S Shah Caters Vs Dr. Ritu Chawla

Arun Jhuraney Vs Shally Jhurney Alias Chandani

M/S Shaheed Sukhdev College of Business Studies Vs Ms Sarita Sagar & Anr.

Hd Engineers Allied Industries Vs Swaminath

Ravi Vs Chairman Cum Managing Director Dtc & Ors.

Sudhir Nirvana @ Sudhir Nayyar Vs Amrit Lal Taneja & Anr.

Mr Naveen Kumar Midha Vs Ms Willis Towers Watson India Insurance Brokers Private Limited & Anr.

BSNL Casual and Contract Workers Union Vs Sh. Mohammad Ozair & Anr.