Petitioners in a contempt case sought permission to withdraw the petition, stating they did not wish to pursue the matter further. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~77
Through: Mr. Asish Nishchal and Mr. Arun Nischal, Advs.
versus
AJAY KUMAR BHALLA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Vedansh Anand, Central Govt. Counsel for Union of India
CORAM:
DHARMESH SHARMA, J.
JULY 18, 2024 sp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/07/2024 at 11:16:43
Sajal Das & Ors.
Ajay Kumar Bhalla
Dharmesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
