Disposed
Manish v. Shilpa
Delhi HCCONT.CAS(C)/662/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Contempt petition arising from a matrimonial dispute. Parties settled amicably through Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini, and agreed to resume living together; petitioner withdrew the petition.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~69
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CONT.CAS(C) 662/2024 MANISH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Midhun Aggarwal, Mr. Rishi Sehgal and Mr. Gagan Kumar Sharma, Advocates
¶4
- versus
¶5
- SHILPA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Khurana, Advocate along with respondent-in-person
¶6
CORAM:
¶7
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
¶8
O R D E R
¶9
- % 18.11.2024
¶10
- At the very outset, learned counsel for the parties inform that both the parities have been able to amicably settle all their matters in relation to the matrimonial dispute in question.
¶11
- It is informed that under the aegis of Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District Court, Delhi, the parties have arrived at amicable settlement and such terms are recorded in mediation settlement dated 28.08.2024 and in terms of the settlement, parties have decided to start living together.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the contempt petition should continue after the parties settled their matrimonial dispute via mediation.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Manish
- respondent
Shilpa
Coram
AI extract
Manoj Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court