Anjul Oberoi v. Smt Sujata Chaturvedi and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition challenging non-compliance of a prior direction to consider a petitioner's representation. Respondents undertook to communicate the outcome within ten days, prompting withdrawal of the petition.
What the court decided
$~103
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1784/2024 ANJUL OBEROI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhruv Joshi and Mr. Ajayh Kanojiya, Advocates
versus SMT SUJATA CHATURVEDI AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Soni (CGSC) with Mr. Devvrat Yadav (G.P), Ms. Sanchari Banerjee and Ms. Ishika Soni, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Mahendharan T., Mr. Raghunatha Sethupathy B. and Ms. Pariksha, Advocates for R-3 & R-4
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R % 12.11.2024
- Petitioner had earlier field a writ petition i.e. W.P. (C) 16646/2023 which was disposed of by learned Single Judge of this Court vide order dated 22.12.2023. Such order reads as under: -
- “1. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that, at this juncture, he would be satisfied if a direction may be given to Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to consider the representation given by the Petitioner in the month of November, 2023.
2. The Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are directed to consider the representation given by the Petitioner as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law.
3. The writ petition is disposed of, along with pending application (s), if any.”
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ANJUL OBEROI
- respondent
SMT SUJATA CHATURVEDI AND ORS
Coram
MANOJ JAIN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court