Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition as not pressed after parties recorded a settlement agreement in an MoU, which included an unconditional apology and payment, leading the petitioner to waive further reliefs.
Contempt petition disposed of as not pressed; settlement terms read; future date cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~92
Through: Mr. Afzal B. Khan, Advocate with Mr. Samik Mukherjee, Mr. Manosij Mukherjee and Mr. Sharad Besoya, Advocates
versus
SHIBAN AHMED ALIAS SHIBAN ANZAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Umesh Mishra and Ms. Yashodhara Raina, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R % 18.11.2024
CM APPL. 66909/2024& CONT.CAS(C) 445/2019
CONT.CAS(C) 445/2019 1
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 05:06:03
MANOJ JAIN, J
NOVEMBER 18, 2024/ dr
CONT.CAS(C) 445/2019 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 05:06:03
FLAMAGAS, S A & ANR
SHIBAN AHMED ALIAS SHIBAN ANZAR
MANOJ JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
