The petitioner's counsel informed the Court that the prayer in the writ petition had been satisfied by further action taken by the Respondent Authority, rendering the petition infructuous. The Court disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~62
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
.....Respondent Through: Ms. Shahana Farah and Ms. Sanna Harta, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
MANOJ JAIN, J
NOVEMBER 12, 2024/ss
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/11/2024 at 11:57:10
MUKUND LAL
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MANOJ JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
