Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a contempt petition in view of an order passed in W.P.(C) 830/2022. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition along with pending applications as withdrawn.
Petition and pending applications dismissed as withdrawn with permission of the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
VISHNU CHAUDHARY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rishi Sood and Mr. Prafull Singh Chander, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sameer Vashisht, ASC with Ms. Harshita Nathrani, Advocate for R-2 and R-5 to 8.
Mr. Adarsh Chamoli, Advocate for R-3. Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel with Mr. Ajjay Aroraa, Mr. Kapil Dutta, Mr. Vansh Luthra and Ms. Simran Arora, Advocates for R-4/MCD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R
% 09.04.2024
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
APRIL 9, 2024 N
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2024 at 11:58:42
Vishnu Chaudhary
Union of India & Ors.
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
