Contempt petition over alleged unauthorized construction; MCD had already acted against the construction and raised no objection. Petitioner's application under Section 151 CPC to withdraw was allowed and the contempt case was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; contempt case dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~100
Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, Advocate.
versus
SHRI GYANESH BHARTI & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Abhinav Singh, Adv. for Delhi Police. Ms. Puja Kalra, Adv. for MCD. Mob: 9312839323
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R
% 10.04.2024 CM APPL. 21667/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 12:55:36
submits that the MCD has no objection, if the present petition is allowed to be withdrawn.
CONT.CAS(C) 354/2024
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
APRIL 10, 2024 ak
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 12:55:36
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Akash Sejwal
Shri Gyanesh Bharti
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
