Court granted exemption to petitioner subject to conditions, directing Municipal Corporation of Delhi to keep specific parks open and maintain them.
Exemption allowed; parties directed to visit specific parks; MCD undertook to keep gates open and maintain parks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MOHD ARSLAN ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Mutiur Rehman with Ms.Shaheen, Advocates.
versus
SHRI GYANESH BHARTI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Jyoti Dutt Sharma with Mr.Ayush Bhatt, Mr.Harsh Rao and Mr.Angad Gautam, Advocates for R-2/MCD. Ms.Mehak Nakra, ASC with Mr.Aditi Kapoor, Advocate for R-3.
Ms.Farhat Jahan Rehmani, ASC with Mr.Faheem Ahmed Khan, Advocates for R-4.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R
% 10.04.2024
C.M.No.20728/2024
CONT.CAS(C) 581/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 12:43:44
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
APRIL 10, 2024 KA
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 12:43:44
Mohd Arslan
Shri Gyanesh Bharti
MCD
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
