Petitioner sought quashing of three letters including forfeiture of her performance security FDR after cancellation of a car-hiring rate contract. Counsel later confined the claim to return of the security. Court held forfeited security cannot be refunded and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
Through: Ms. Aayushi Jain and Ms. Gunjan Negi, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Ms. Tania Ahlawat, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik and Ms. Aliza Alam, Advocates for R-2 & 3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
O R D E R
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2024 at 12:06:17
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
APRIL 9, 2024 / sk / hvk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2024 at 12:06:17
1 issue framed by the court
Whether forfeited performance security must be returned after cancellation of the petitioner's rate contract for hiring cars.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manju Mukhija
Union of India and Ors.
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
