The High Court disposed of the petition noting that the petitioner's representation had already been adjudicated via a speaking order. The court directed the respondent to communicate the order within two working days and allowed the petitioner liberty to explore other legal recourse, disposing of the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~77
SHRI KESHAV CHANDRA & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, SC with Mr. Akshat Kulshreshtha and Mr. D S Bhanu, Advocates for NDMC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
MANOJ JAIN, J
DECEMBER 4, 2024/ sw
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2024 at 12:40:17
NAND KISHOR
SHRI KESHAV CHANDRA & ANR.
MANOJ JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
