Sanjeet Gahlot v. Arun Goel
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition concerning DDA; respondent undertook to file a fresh affidavit stating whether any plot of any size is available in Dwarka or, if not, what plots are available in the adjacent area. Affidavit directed within ten days and matter re-notified for 12 February 2025.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~122
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CONT.CAS(C) 895/2016 & CM APPL. 72257/2024 & CM APPL. 72338/2024 & CM APPL. 1295-1297/2025
| SANJEET GAHL | OT | .....Petitioner |
|---|---|---|
| Through: versus |
Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nimish Kumar and Mr. Nitin Kumar, Advocates. |
|
| ARUN GOEL | .....Respondent | |
| Through: | Mr. Arvind Varma, Sr. Advocate with | |
| Ms.Kritika Gupta, Ms. Smridhi | ||
| Sharma, Advocates and Mr. Kuldeep, Director, DDA. |
||
| Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel for respondent No.2/L&B |
||
| and Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and | ||
| Mr. M.S. Akhtar, Advocates. |
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R
% 10.01.2025
- It is undertaken from the side of respondent that a fresh affidavit will be filed by DDA clearly specifying therein that whether any plot of any size whatsoever is still available with DDA in Dwarka or not and if not, then what other plots are available in the adjacent area.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sanjeet Gahlot
- respondent
Arun Goel
Coram
Manoj Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court