Petitioner withdrew contempt proceedings against respondent counsel upon receiving an assurance of earlier disposal. Liberty to revive was granted if no decision is taken within two weeks.
Petition not pressed; liberty granted to revive present contempt petition if no decision taken within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~76
Through: Mr. Bharat Aggarwal with Mr. Kanhaiya and Ms. Deepanshi Singhal, Advocates.
versus
SHRI KESHAV CHANDRA & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, SC with Mr. Akshat Kulshreshtha and Mr. D S Bhanu, Advocates for NDMC. Mr. Mananjay Mishra with Mr. Bhanu Raj, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R % 04.12.2024
CONT.CAS(C) 1916/2024 1
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2024 at 12:40:21
MANOJ JAIN, J
DECEMBER 4, 2024/ sw
CONT.CAS(C) 1916/2024 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2024 at 12:40:21
Vikas Gupta
Shri Keshav Chandra & Ors.
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
