Petition alleging wilful disobedience of an order requiring payment of outstanding salary was withdrawn after the respondent confirmed full payment for March to October 2024; the court permitted withdrawal and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
MEENA KUMARI AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. N. Sai Vinod, Advocate
versus
DELHI COMMISSION FOR WOMEN .....Respondent Through: Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, ASC, GNCTD Ms. Zehra Khan and Ms. Ravicha Sharma, Advocates for R-1(1A) and R-1(1B)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
O R D E R % 17.12.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/12/2024 at 12:54:53
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
DECEMBER 17, 2024 g.joshi
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/12/2024 at 12:54:53
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition could be withdrawn after outstanding salary for March to October 2024 was fully paid as per the Court's order of 14.10.2024.
Meena Kumari and Ors.
Delhi Commission for Women
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
