Disposed

Rakesh Sood v. Roy Brothers, a Partnership Firm & Ors.

Delhi HC16 Dec 2024CONT.CAS(C)/996/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner approached court for recovery of outstanding dues. Respondents undertook to clear the amount of Rs. 7,95,000/- by 31.01.2025. Petitioner withdrew plea with liberty to revive if breach occurs. Petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with liberty to petitioner to revive the petition in case respondents fail to clear the payment by 31.01.2025.

Rakesh Sood Vs Roy Brothers, a Partnership… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~49

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 996/2023, CM APPL. 50607/2023 & CM APPL. 65418/2024

¶4

RAKESH SOOD

¶5

.....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shrey Singhal, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

ROY BROTHERS, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM & ORS.

¶8

.....Respondent Through: Mr. Pran Krishna Jana, Advocate for R-2 and 3 with respondent (through VC).

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 16.12.2024

¶12

Learned counsel for respondents, on instructions, submits that outstanding amount of Rs. 7,95,000/- shall be cleared positively on or before 31.01.2025.

¶13

Respondent No. 2 and respondent No.3 have also joined the proceedings through video conferencing and reiterate the above and undertake that the balance payment of Rs. 7,95,000/- shall be cleared on or before 31.01.2025.

¶14

Such statements are taken on record.

¶15

In view of the above said statement and assurance given by respondents, learned counsel for petitioner, at the moment, submits that she is

¶16

CONT.CAS(C) 996/2023 1

¶17

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2024 at 11:36:32

¶18

no longer interested in pursuing with the present petition. She, however, submits that, in case, despite the expiry of the aforesaid period as undertaken above, the respondents do not clear the payment, she may be permitted to revive the present petition.

¶19

It is made clear that, in case, there is any further violation or breach of the aforesaid undertaking, it will be taken as a case of ‘ aggravated contempt’ . 6. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Liberty, as prayed, is granted.

¶20

MANOJ JAIN, J

¶21

DECEMBER 16, 2024/ sw

¶22

CONT.CAS(C) 996/2023 2

¶23

Rakesh Sood v. Roy Brothers, a Partnership Firm & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Sood v. Roy Brothers, a Partnership Firm & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ab Vs Cd

Raghubir Singh & Ors. Vs Sh. Gyanesh Bharti & Ors.

Sharda Devi Vs Shri Dharmendra & Ors.

Ni-Met Metals Inc. Vs Director General of Foreign Trade and Anr. & Anr.

Poonam Dabas Vs Sh Vijay Dev Dabas . & Ors.

Meena Kumari and Ors. Vs Delhi Commission for Women

Va Pugazhendi Vs the Election Commission of India & Ors.

Rahul Kumar Vs Director General, Sashastra Seema Bal (Ssb) and Anr.

Ab Vs Cd

Raghubir Singh & Ors. Vs Sh. Gyanesh Bharti & Ors.

Anubhav Singh Advocate Vs Delhi Development Authority

Vinkal Girish Shah Vs Suraj Kumar

Rabab Zehra Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi through Its Commissioner & Ors.

Vinit Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.