In a contempt petition, the petitioner submitted that the matter is no longer pursued as the Arbitral Tribunal was constituted during pendency before the Supreme Court.
Petition disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~87
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Mishra, Advocate.
versus
M/S OMAXE LIMITED THROUGH ITS AR MS SHIKHA SHARMA
.....Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R % 18.12.2024 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for petitioner submits that during the pendency of the matter before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Arbitral Tribunal has already been constituted.
MANOJ JAIN, J
DECEMBER 18, 2024/ sw
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/12/2024 at 12:44:57
HARJEET SINGH
M/S OMAXE LIMITED
MANOJ JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
