Contempt petition filed for disobedience of a direction to consider representations regarding alleged criminal activities. The court dismissed the petition, holding that contempt jurisdiction should not be invoked as the petitioner has other efficacious remedies.
The present contempt petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~100
Through: Mr. R. P. S Bhatti, Adv.
versus
DR. JOY TERKY .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA O R D E R % 23.09.2024
CM APPL. 55771/2024 (Ex.)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2024 at 11:30:59
DHARMESH SHARMA, J
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 sp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2024 at 11:30:59
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present contempt petition should be entertained given the petitioner has other efficacious remedies for the alleged criminal activities.
Whether the jurisdiction of contempt should be invoked sparingly and in exceptional cases in this instance.
Om Pal Singh
Dr. Joy Terky
Dharmesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
