This order dismisses the appellant's contempt petition as withdrawn after the Enforcement Director stated they were not contemplating taking possession of the subject properties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~123
NAVYA RAJPUT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. P.R. Sikka and Mr. Surinder Pruthi, Advs.
versus
RAJEEV JAIN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Special Counsel-ED with Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Mr. Pranjal Tripathi, Mr. Kanishk Mourya, Mr. Kunal Kochar, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA O R D E R
% 23.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2024 at 11:30:54
DHARMESH SHARMA, J
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 sp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2024 at 11:30:54
Navya Rajput
Rajeev Jain
Dharmesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
