The petitioners in contempt proceedings were discharged. The court observed that while the respondents had not fully complied with a tribunal order, they had granted the same pay and grade to others, leading to the discharge of the petition.
Petition for contempt discharge allowed proceeding of other.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
DR KRISHNA NAND MAURYA & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Skanda Shekhar and Mr. Shivam Kaushik, Advocates
versus
DR N KALAISELVI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: R-1 in person
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R % 20.09.2024
CONT.CAS(C) 1308/2024
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 04:27:16
liberty to challenge the same before the appropriate forum.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
SEPTEMBER 20, 2024 /rk
CONT.CAS(C) 1308/2024
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 04:27:16
DR KRISHNA NAND MAURYA
DR N KALAISELVI
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
GIRISH KATHPALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
