A petitioner sought initiation of contempt proceedings for alleged wilful disobedience of a direction to consider a representation. The court found the representation had been decided and notified the petitioner, consequently dismissing the contempt petition.
Petition for contempt proceedings dismissed; application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~99
KALPANA KUMARI THROUGH SITA RAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shahil Rao, Mr. Rahul Yadav, Mr. Sharukh Sharma & Ms. Divya Sharma, Advs.
versus
ANISH DAYAL SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hilal Haide, GP, Mr. Butul Khan and Ms. Mehak Fatima, Advs.
Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Ansari, SPC with Mr. H Haider, GP. Mr. Ajay Pal, AC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
O R D E R % 23.09.2024
CM APPL. 55765/2024 – EXMP.
CONT.CAS(C) 1517/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2024 at 11:31:03
DHARMESH SHARMA, J
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 Ch
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2024 at 11:31:03
Kalpana Kumari
Anish Dayal Singh
Dharmesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
