The Delhi High Court disposed of an application seeking modification of a Family Court order. The respondent husband withdrew the application, and the court disposed of it as not pressed without prejudice to rights.
Application disposed of as not pressed. Liberty to party to approach Family Court remains.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
Through: Mr. Vaibhav Vats, Advocate (DHCLSC)
versus
HAREESH VERMA .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Manu Shankar Mishra with Mr. Nishant Kumar, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R
% 23.12.2024
CM APPL.75696/2024 (exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CM APPL. 75695/2024 (filed on behalf of respondent for recall of order dated 23.09.2024)
CONT.CAS(C) 1073/2024
1
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/12/2024 at 11:54:56
MANOJ JAIN, J
DECEMBER 23, 2024 st
CONT.CAS(C) 1073/2024
2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/12/2024 at 11:54:56
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application seeking modification of an earlier order under Section 127 Cr.P.C. is maintainable when filed recently.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pooja Verma
Hareesh Verma
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
