Defendant sought relief from costs imposed on dismissal of his Order VII Rule 11 CPC application. He did not press the petition and only sought waiver of the Rs. 50,000 cost, which was waived with respondent's consent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~70
Through: Mr. Abhijat and Mr. Abhinav Ramkrishna, Advocates
versus
JASVINDER KAUR WALIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hemat Gupta, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R
% 16.08.2024 CM APPL. 47094/2024 (exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CM(M) 3180/2024 & CM APPL. 47093/2024
CM(M) 3180/2024 1
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2024 at 12:48:21
MANOJ JAIN, J
AUGUST 16, 2024/ dr
CM(M) 3180/2024 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2024 at 12:48:21
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rakesh Verma
Jasvinder Kaur Walia
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
