The High Court of Delhi disposed of a stay petition by directing the trial court to hear an order I Rule 10 CPC application for deletion of parties. Evidence recording was deferred, and the next date was cancelled.
Trial Court directed to hear application under Order I Rule 10 CPC and dispose of the main matter thereafter; next date cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~77
KASTURI RAJAN & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Virender Goswami with Ms.Swati Goswami and Mr. Parkhi Singh, Advocates.
versus
VATSALA VESCIO & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Avneesh Garg with Mr. Harsh Pal, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
J U D G M E N T (oral)
Signature Not Verified
CM(M) 1924/2024 1
Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 6.08.2024 17:50:07
application moved by the plaintiff under Order I Rule 10 CPC seeking deletion of defendant Nos.5 and 6 and after hearing arguments with respect to said application, it would dispose of the aforesaid application and thereafter, proceed with the main matter in accordance with law.
(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE
AUGUST 14, 2024 st
Signature Not Verified
CM(M) 1924/2024 2
Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 6.08.2024 17:50:07
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application under Order I Rule 10 CPC for deletion of parties can be withdrawn.
KASTURI RAJAN & ORS.
VATSALA VESCIO & ORS.
MANOJ JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
