Petitioner argued the petition was infructuous as they had already taken possession of the suit property. The court disposed of the petition as infructuous.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Leekha with Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocate along with petitioner in person.
versus
NAND GOPAL JETHI & ORS.
.....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R
% 21.08.2024
MANOJ JAIN, J
AUGUST 21, 2024/ sw
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/08/2024 at 11:11:07
Davender Kuma Dung & Ors.
Nand Gopal Jethi & Ors.
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
