Petitioner, a landlady, approached the Court aggrieved by an order allowing tenant's appeal. Petitioner stated she had already recovered possession and was no longer interested in pursuing the petition. Court dismissed the present petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate with petitioner in person (Through VC)
versus
KULDEEP SINGH .....Respondent
Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
MANOJ JAIN, J
AUGUST 16, 2024/ dr
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2024 at 12:48:24
Aruna Mehtani
Kuldeep Singh
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
