Allowed

Vasant Kunj (C-8) Resident Welfare Association v. Nivaasee Kalyan Sangathan & Ors.

Delhi HC15 May 2024CM(M)/2439/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, in a petition invoking its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 226, disposed of an appeal against an interim order from a Civil Suit. It set aside the stand-alone application seeking disposal of an injunction application within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

The petition and pending application were disposed of; Trial Court directed to dispose of injunction application within two weeks.

Vasant Kunj (C-8) Resident Welfare Association… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~2

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CM(M) 2439/2024

¶4

VASANT KUNJ (C-8) RESIDENT WELFARE ASSOCIATION

¶5

..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jatin Kapur, Mr. Shantanu Awasthi & Mr. Bhavya Rana, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

NIVAASEE KALYAN SANGATHAN & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajjay Aroraa, Mr. Kapil Dutta, Mr. Vansh Luthra & Mr. Simran Arora, Advs. for R-9. Mr. Indrani Sen, Standing Counsel for DDA.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR O R D E R % 15.05.2024

¶10

CM APPL. 24914/2024—Exp.

¶11

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

Application stands disposed of.

¶13

CM(M) 2439/2024, CM APPL. 24915/2024--stay

¶14

This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking directions for disposal of the application moved under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) filed by the petitioner in CS SCJ 1369/2022 titled as „ Vasant Kunj C8 Resident Welfare Association vs. Nivaasee Kalyan Sangathan & Ors .‟ to invoke the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court to dispose of the

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2024 at 11:28:19

¶16

application in a time bound manner or in the alternative to set aside the orders dated 13.10.2022 and 15.10.2022 passed by the learned Trial Court whereby the status quo has been ordered.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 01.10.2022, the petitioner filed a suit before the learned Trial Court against the respondents for declaration, permanent and mandatory injunction. Alongside the suit, the petitioner moved an application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC read with Section 151 CPC seeking grant of ex-parte ad interim injunction against respondent nos. 1 to 8 thereby restraining them directly or indirectly from interfering in day-to-day functioning of the petitioner.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that after the issuance of the summons, respondent nos. 1 to 8 appeared and contested the suit. It is further submitted that since 01.10.2022, the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC has not been disposed of by the learned Trial Court and the case is at the stage of completion of pleadings and issues are yet to be framed.

¶19

It is submitted by the learned counsel that the matter is listed before the learned Trial Court on 24.07.2024 for further arguments on the aforesaid application. The learned Trial Court to hear the arguments on the said application and dispose of the same within two weeks from the date fixed before it.

¶20

With the above observations, the present petition as well as pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

¶21

SHALINDER KAUR, J

¶22

MAY 15, 2024/ ab

¶23

Vasant Kunj (C-8) Resident Welfare Association v. Nivaasee Kalyan Sangathan & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vasant Kunj (C-8) Resident Welfare Association v. Nivaasee Kalyan Sangathan & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayaditta Palit & Anr. Vs Pramod Anand through His Legal Heir

M/S Satyam Developers Vs Rahul Dubey & Anr.

M/S Gardenia India Ltd. & Anr. Vs Dr Rakesh Kumar (Huf)

Naresh Kumar Arora Vs State & Ors.

M/S. Sonam Builder through Its Partner, Mr. Bharat Mithalal Jain, Vs Mr. Birendra Indramani Shukla & Ors.

R. Kesavan Vs National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission

Vimlendu Kumar Jha Vs Minal Bhatnagar

Uniworld Transerv Private Limited Vs Bansal Oil Lubricants Co.

Jayaditta Palit & Anr. Vs Pramod Anand through His Legal Heir

M/S Satyam Developers Vs Rahul Dubey & Anr.

M/S Gardenia India Ltd. & Anr. Vs Dr Rakesh Kumar (Huf)

Banwari Lal Vs Sonia Devi & Anr.

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs Sh. Rakesh

Lalman Vs M/S Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. & Anr.